The sources of mercury in hospital wastewaters include potable water supply, medical equipment breakage, laboratory chemicals, medicinal wastes, amalgam from dental clinics, human amalgam and dietary waste retained in wastewater sumps and traps. Cleaning products used in hospitals may contain trace mercury levels from the caustic soda used in production of soap or from chemicals that may contain traces of mercury as an impurity. This Study assesses the mercury content in hospital waste water from the hospital in Jhansi City. Samples were collected from three different sites during different season and were analyzed quantitatively. The quantity of mercury ranged between 0.100 mg/L to 0.150 mg/L. the higher conc. is found in waste water samples collected from site C which is the disposal site of laboratory, radiology department, operation theatre etc. These finding are higher than agreeable limit of EPA which is 0.002 mg/L. This indicates the contamination of receiving environment due to discharge of mercury in hospital waste water which could harm human and aquatic life. In this study in methods were used for reduction of mercury in hospital waste water. The sulfide precipitation reduced the quantity of mercury from 0.210 mg/L to 0.006 mg/L. By using charcoal, it was found that mercury was reduced from 0.210 mg/L to 0.003 mg/L.
Published in | International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis (Volume 2, Issue 6) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijema.20140206.15 |
Page(s) | 328-332 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2014. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Hospital Waste Water, Mercury, EPA, Jhansi City
[1] | Executive summary. In: Mercury Study Report to Congress. Vol. 1. Washington: Environmental Protection Agency (US), Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards and Office of Research and Development; 1997. Pub.No.: EPA-452/R-97-003. |
[2] | Larry Walker Associates. Mercury pollution prevention. Palo Alto (CA): Palo Alto Regional Water Quality Authority; 1997 Oct. |
[3] | Kameyama, K. (1992) Reducing Mercury Wastes at Hospitals. Water Environment and Technology, 4(5): p. 70-72. |
[4] | Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies, Household Mercury Poses National Clean Water Compliance Concerns. Accessed February 27, 2003. http://www.amsacleanwater. org/advocacy/releases/82200.cfm |
[5] | Walker, L.(2000) Mercury Source Control and Pollution Prevention Program Evaluation. Larry Walker and Associates, 1-57. http://www.amsacleanwater. org/advocacy/mercgrant/finalrepor.pdf |
[6] | Jenkins, D. and Russell, L.L. (1994) The Heavy Metals Contribution of Household Washing Products to Heavy Metals in Wastewater. Water Environmental Research, 66: p.805. |
[7] | Appegate, L.E. (1984) Membrane Separation Processes, Excerpted by special permission from Chemical Engineering 91,64. Copyright 1984 by Mc. Graw Hill,Inc,N.Y.10020. |
[8] | Geselbarcht, J.( 1996) Micro Filtration/Reverse osmosis pilot trials for Livermore, California, Advanced Water Reclamation, in: 1996 Water Reuse Conference Proceedings, AWWA, p. 187. |
[9] | Schnoor, J. L. (1997) Phytore-mediation TE- 97-01, Ground water Remediation technologies, analysis centre, Pittsburgh. |
[10] | Sengupta, A. K. and Clifford, D. (1986) Environ. Sci. Technol. 20, 149. |
[11] | EPA 625/8-80-003 Summary report 1980 control and treatment technology for the Metal Finishing Industry; Sulfide Precipitation, Technology Transfer Division, Washington, D.C. |
[12] | Patterson, J.W. and Minear, R. N. (1975) Physical – chemical methods of Heavy metals removal. In heavy metals in the Aquatic Environment (P.A. Krenkel, ed.), pp. 261-276. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press. |
[13] | Peters, R.W., Ku, Y. and Bhattacharya, D.(1985) Evaluation of Recent Treatment Techniques for removal of heavy metals from industrial waste waters. AICHE Symposium Series, Separation of Heavy metals and other contaminants, 81 (243) : 165-203. |
[14] | Jeffery, G.H., Bassett, J., Mendham, J. and Denny, R. C.(1989) Vogel’s Textbook of Quantitative Chemical Analysis, 5th ed. Longman, New York. |
[15] | Barr Engineering, Substance Flow Analysis of Mercury in Products. 2001, Barr Engineering, 4700 77th Street, Minneapolis, MN 55435, USA, p. 91. http://www.pca.state.mn.us/ publications/hg-substance.pdf. |
[16] | Colquitt, P.J. (1995) The Effect of Mercury Vapor Exposure on the Fertility of Female Dental Assistants [letter]. Occupational Environmental Medicine,52: p.21. |
[17] | Colquitt, P.J. (1999) Will the Millimeter of Mercury be Replaced by the Kilopascal? Journal of Hypertension, 17: p. 305-306. |
[18] | Clarkson, T.W. (2002) The Three Modern Faces of Mercury. Environmental Health Perspectives, .110(1): p.11-23. |
[19] | Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies, Evaluation of Domestic Sources of Mercury. Washington, DC 2000, pp. 9, 10, 12, Table 5, Table 6. http://www.amsacleanwater. org/pubs/mercury/mercury.pdf |
[20] | Harvie, J. (1997) Eliminating Mercury Use in Hospital Laboratories. A Step Towards Zero Discharge. Public Health Reports, 114: p.353-358. |
[21] | Nalle, C. Personal Communication, 14/15/03. EIP Associates. 601 Montgomery Street, Suite 500, San Francisco, California 94111. |
[22] | MASCO, Mercury Database, Medical Academic and Scientific Community Organization, Inc. http://www1.netcasters.com /mercury/. |
[23] | Jenkins, D. (1998) The Effect of Reformulation of Household Powder Laundry Detergents on Their contribution to Heavy Metals in Wastewater. Water Environmental Research, 70(5): p. 980-983. |
[24] | EPA, DRAFT Wisconsin Mercury Sourcebook: Hospitals, Wiscosin Department of Natural Resources, http://www.epa.gov/glnpo/bnsdocs/ hgsbook/hospital.pdf. |
[25] | Technical Resource Document, Treatment Technologies for Metal/Cyanide-containing Wastes. (EPA 1987) Hazardous Waste Engineering Research Laboratory, NTIS Order number PB 38-143896 |
[26] | Scott, M.C. (1979) An EPA Demonstration Plant for Heavy metals removal by sulfide precipitation. In Proc. 2nd conference Advanced Pollution control for Metal finishing industry. |
[27] | Huang, C.P. and Blankenship, D.W. ( 1984) The removal of mercury (II) from dilute aqueous solution by activated carbon. Water Res. 18(1):3746. |
[28] | Gates, D. D., Chao, K. K., and Cameron, P. A.(1995) Mercury removal from liquid and solid mixed wastes. Presented at 1995 waste management conference, Tu cson, Arizone (February 26- March 2,1996). |
APA Style
Bhupinder Kaur, Rishi Kumar Saxena, Ranmeet Kaur. (2014). Quantitative Analysis of Mercury Burden in Waste Water Released from Hospital in Jhansi, U.P.. International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis, 2(6), 328-332. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijema.20140206.15
ACS Style
Bhupinder Kaur; Rishi Kumar Saxena; Ranmeet Kaur. Quantitative Analysis of Mercury Burden in Waste Water Released from Hospital in Jhansi, U.P.. Int. J. Environ. Monit. Anal. 2014, 2(6), 328-332. doi: 10.11648/j.ijema.20140206.15
AMA Style
Bhupinder Kaur, Rishi Kumar Saxena, Ranmeet Kaur. Quantitative Analysis of Mercury Burden in Waste Water Released from Hospital in Jhansi, U.P.. Int J Environ Monit Anal. 2014;2(6):328-332. doi: 10.11648/j.ijema.20140206.15
@article{10.11648/j.ijema.20140206.15, author = {Bhupinder Kaur and Rishi Kumar Saxena and Ranmeet Kaur}, title = {Quantitative Analysis of Mercury Burden in Waste Water Released from Hospital in Jhansi, U.P.}, journal = {International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis}, volume = {2}, number = {6}, pages = {328-332}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijema.20140206.15}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijema.20140206.15}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijema.20140206.15}, abstract = {The sources of mercury in hospital wastewaters include potable water supply, medical equipment breakage, laboratory chemicals, medicinal wastes, amalgam from dental clinics, human amalgam and dietary waste retained in wastewater sumps and traps. Cleaning products used in hospitals may contain trace mercury levels from the caustic soda used in production of soap or from chemicals that may contain traces of mercury as an impurity. This Study assesses the mercury content in hospital waste water from the hospital in Jhansi City. Samples were collected from three different sites during different season and were analyzed quantitatively. The quantity of mercury ranged between 0.100 mg/L to 0.150 mg/L. the higher conc. is found in waste water samples collected from site C which is the disposal site of laboratory, radiology department, operation theatre etc. These finding are higher than agreeable limit of EPA which is 0.002 mg/L. This indicates the contamination of receiving environment due to discharge of mercury in hospital waste water which could harm human and aquatic life. In this study in methods were used for reduction of mercury in hospital waste water. The sulfide precipitation reduced the quantity of mercury from 0.210 mg/L to 0.006 mg/L. By using charcoal, it was found that mercury was reduced from 0.210 mg/L to 0.003 mg/L.}, year = {2014} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Quantitative Analysis of Mercury Burden in Waste Water Released from Hospital in Jhansi, U.P. AU - Bhupinder Kaur AU - Rishi Kumar Saxena AU - Ranmeet Kaur Y1 - 2014/12/02 PY - 2014 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijema.20140206.15 DO - 10.11648/j.ijema.20140206.15 T2 - International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis JF - International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis JO - International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis SP - 328 EP - 332 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-7667 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijema.20140206.15 AB - The sources of mercury in hospital wastewaters include potable water supply, medical equipment breakage, laboratory chemicals, medicinal wastes, amalgam from dental clinics, human amalgam and dietary waste retained in wastewater sumps and traps. Cleaning products used in hospitals may contain trace mercury levels from the caustic soda used in production of soap or from chemicals that may contain traces of mercury as an impurity. This Study assesses the mercury content in hospital waste water from the hospital in Jhansi City. Samples were collected from three different sites during different season and were analyzed quantitatively. The quantity of mercury ranged between 0.100 mg/L to 0.150 mg/L. the higher conc. is found in waste water samples collected from site C which is the disposal site of laboratory, radiology department, operation theatre etc. These finding are higher than agreeable limit of EPA which is 0.002 mg/L. This indicates the contamination of receiving environment due to discharge of mercury in hospital waste water which could harm human and aquatic life. In this study in methods were used for reduction of mercury in hospital waste water. The sulfide precipitation reduced the quantity of mercury from 0.210 mg/L to 0.006 mg/L. By using charcoal, it was found that mercury was reduced from 0.210 mg/L to 0.003 mg/L. VL - 2 IS - 6 ER -