This paper aims to investigate the evaporative cooling limitations of compressor intake-air for improving the performance of gas turbine power plants. The limitations of the evaporative cooling capability are analyzed and formulated in terms of the characteristic dimensions involving the temperature ratio, the power gain ratio (PGR), thermal efficiency change, and humidity ratio. The effects of different pressure ratios (PRs) are examined for Saudi Arabia summer weather when the turbine inlet temperature is predetermined at1373.15 K. The results of a specific example where the air evaporative cooler drops the temperature to the wet bulb temperature are presented. These indicate that the power gain ratio enhancement depends on the ambient temperature, relative humidity, evaporative cooler effectiveness, and slightly the PR. Especially for PR =10, the PGR is enhanced by 9% at 20% of relative humidity and dropped to 3.37% at 60% of relative humidity. The daily performance of the evaporative cooling method is examined for the hot humid conditions of Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. The results show that the evaporative cooler increased both the daily power output and the thermal efficiency by 2.52% and 0.112%, respectively.
Published in | International Journal of Energy and Power Engineering (Volume 4, Issue 5) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijepe.20150405.18 |
Page(s) | 287-297 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2015. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Gas Turbine, Air-Cooling, Power Enhancement, Evaporative Cooler
[1] | Zadpoor_AA, Golshan AH. Performance improvement of a gas turbine cycle by using adesiccant-based evaporative cooling system. Energy 2006; 31:2652-2664. |
[2] | Chaker M, Homji CBM, Mee III TR. Inlet fogging of gas turbine engines. Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo; 2001 June 4-7; New Orleans, USA; 2001. |
[3] | AL-Hamdan OR, Saker AA.Studying the role played by evaporative cooler on the performance of GE gas turbine existed in Shuaiba North Electric Generator Power Plant. Energy Power Eng 2013; 5:391-400. |
[4] | Johnson RS. The theory and operation of evaporative coolers for industrial gas turbine installations. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 1989; 111:327-334. |
[5] | Alhazmy MM, Najjar YSH. Augmentation of gas turbine performance using air coolers. App Therm Eng 2004; 24:415-429. |
[6] | Meher H, Cyrus B, Mee RT, Thomas R. Inlet fogging of gas turbine engines, part B: droplet sizing analysis nozzle types, measurement and testing. Proc ASME Turbo Exo 2002; 2002 June 3-6; Amsterdam, The Netherlands. |
[7] | Bettocchi R, Spina PR, Moberti F. Gas turbine inlet air cooling using non-adiabatic saturation process. ASME Cogen-Turbo Power Conf; 1995 August 23-25; Vienna, Austria .ASME; 1995.p.1-10. |
[8] | Cyrus B, Mee RT. Gas turbine power augmentation by fogging of inlet air. Proc 28th Turbomach Symp. 1999.p.95-114. |
[9] | Korakianities T, Wilson DG. Models for predicting the performance of Brayton-cycle engines.Eng Gas Turbine Power 1994; 116:381-388. |
[10] | Klein KA, Alvarado FL. EES-Engineering Equation Solver, F-Chart Software.Middleton, WI. |
[11] | Dossat RJ. Principles of refrigeration, New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1997. |
[12] | Cortes CPE, Willems D. Gas turbine inlet cooling techniques: an overview of current technology. Proc Power GEN 2003; 2003 Dec. 9-11;Nevada, USA. |
[13] | McQuiston FC, Parker JD, SpilterJD. Heating, ventilating and air conditioning: design and analysis, 5th ed. New York: Willey; 2000. |
[14] | Li KW, Priddy A P. Power plant system design. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1985. |
APA Style
Majed Alhazmy, Badr Habeebullah, Rahim Jassim. (2015). Limitations of Inlet Air Evaporative Cooling System for Enhancing Gas Turbine Performance in Hot and Humid Climates. International Journal of Energy and Power Engineering, 4(5), 287-297. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepe.20150405.18
ACS Style
Majed Alhazmy; Badr Habeebullah; Rahim Jassim. Limitations of Inlet Air Evaporative Cooling System for Enhancing Gas Turbine Performance in Hot and Humid Climates. Int. J. Energy Power Eng. 2015, 4(5), 287-297. doi: 10.11648/j.ijepe.20150405.18
AMA Style
Majed Alhazmy, Badr Habeebullah, Rahim Jassim. Limitations of Inlet Air Evaporative Cooling System for Enhancing Gas Turbine Performance in Hot and Humid Climates. Int J Energy Power Eng. 2015;4(5):287-297. doi: 10.11648/j.ijepe.20150405.18
@article{10.11648/j.ijepe.20150405.18, author = {Majed Alhazmy and Badr Habeebullah and Rahim Jassim}, title = {Limitations of Inlet Air Evaporative Cooling System for Enhancing Gas Turbine Performance in Hot and Humid Climates}, journal = {International Journal of Energy and Power Engineering}, volume = {4}, number = {5}, pages = {287-297}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijepe.20150405.18}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepe.20150405.18}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijepe.20150405.18}, abstract = {This paper aims to investigate the evaporative cooling limitations of compressor intake-air for improving the performance of gas turbine power plants. The limitations of the evaporative cooling capability are analyzed and formulated in terms of the characteristic dimensions involving the temperature ratio, the power gain ratio (PGR), thermal efficiency change, and humidity ratio. The effects of different pressure ratios (PRs) are examined for Saudi Arabia summer weather when the turbine inlet temperature is predetermined at1373.15 K. The results of a specific example where the air evaporative cooler drops the temperature to the wet bulb temperature are presented. These indicate that the power gain ratio enhancement depends on the ambient temperature, relative humidity, evaporative cooler effectiveness, and slightly the PR. Especially for PR =10, the PGR is enhanced by 9% at 20% of relative humidity and dropped to 3.37% at 60% of relative humidity. The daily performance of the evaporative cooling method is examined for the hot humid conditions of Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. The results show that the evaporative cooler increased both the daily power output and the thermal efficiency by 2.52% and 0.112%, respectively.}, year = {2015} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Limitations of Inlet Air Evaporative Cooling System for Enhancing Gas Turbine Performance in Hot and Humid Climates AU - Majed Alhazmy AU - Badr Habeebullah AU - Rahim Jassim Y1 - 2015/11/03 PY - 2015 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepe.20150405.18 DO - 10.11648/j.ijepe.20150405.18 T2 - International Journal of Energy and Power Engineering JF - International Journal of Energy and Power Engineering JO - International Journal of Energy and Power Engineering SP - 287 EP - 297 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2326-960X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepe.20150405.18 AB - This paper aims to investigate the evaporative cooling limitations of compressor intake-air for improving the performance of gas turbine power plants. The limitations of the evaporative cooling capability are analyzed and formulated in terms of the characteristic dimensions involving the temperature ratio, the power gain ratio (PGR), thermal efficiency change, and humidity ratio. The effects of different pressure ratios (PRs) are examined for Saudi Arabia summer weather when the turbine inlet temperature is predetermined at1373.15 K. The results of a specific example where the air evaporative cooler drops the temperature to the wet bulb temperature are presented. These indicate that the power gain ratio enhancement depends on the ambient temperature, relative humidity, evaporative cooler effectiveness, and slightly the PR. Especially for PR =10, the PGR is enhanced by 9% at 20% of relative humidity and dropped to 3.37% at 60% of relative humidity. The daily performance of the evaporative cooling method is examined for the hot humid conditions of Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. The results show that the evaporative cooler increased both the daily power output and the thermal efficiency by 2.52% and 0.112%, respectively. VL - 4 IS - 5 ER -