| Peer-Reviewed

Some Growth Promoting Essential Mineral Elements Alleviates The Salinity Effect on Nitrate Reductase and Hill Reaction Activities in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) cv. “CIM 496”

Received: 29 December 2014     Accepted: 13 February 2015     Published: 25 February 2015
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The effect of salinity was observed on the activity of nitrate reductase and hill reaction activity in the leaves of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cv. “CIM 496” grown in large size plastic pot culture, irrigated with sea salt concentrations of 0.0%(EC iw: 0.6 dS/m), 0.4%(EC iw: 6.2 dS/m) and 0.8%(EC iw: 10.8 dS/m) and subjected to foliar application with non-spray (control), water spray, KNO3 (500 ppm), KCl (500 ppm), Urea(1000 ppm), Fe-EDTA (5ppm), MnCl2 (5ppm) and MoO3 (5ppm) alone and their mixture. Foliar spray of the mixture showed better result as compared to that of above mentioned individual mineral. Conclusion made on the comparative performance of nitrate reductase and hill reaction enzymes under above number of treatments in the leaves of cotton growing under various sea salt concentrations is given below: Nitrate Reductase Activity (NRA): Nonspray< water spray< KCl< Mo< KNO3< Urea< KNO3 + Mo< KNO3 +Fe + Mn + Mo; Hill Reaction Activity (HRA): Nonspray< water spray< KNO3

Published in Journal of Plant Sciences (Volume 3, Issue 2)
DOI 10.11648/j.jps.20150302.12
Page(s) 54-58
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2015. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Salinity, Gossypium, EC iw (Electrical Conductivity of Irrigation Water), Foliar Spray, Nitrate Reductase Activity, Hill Reaction Activity

References
[1] Greenway, H. & Munns, R. 1980. Mechanism of salt tolerance in non-halophytes, Annu. Rev, Plant Physiol., 31: 149-190.
[2] Tanji, K.K. 1990. Nature and extent of agricultural salinity. In: Agricultural Salinity Assessment and Management (Tanji, K K eds.), pp. 1-13. ASCE, New York.
[3] Kapoor, K. & Srivastava, A. 2010. Assessment of salinity tolerance of Vigna mungo Var.Pu-19 using ex vitro and in vitro methods. Asian Journal of Biotechnology 2(2): 73-85.
[4] Pasternak, D. & Pietro, S. 1985. Biosalinity in action: Bioproduction with saline water. Plant Soil., 89:1-413.
[5] Cheeseman, J.M. 1988. Mechanism of salinity tolerance in plants. Plant Physiol., 87: 547-550.
[6] Lauchli, A. 1990. Calcium, salinity and the plasma membrane. In: Calcium on plant growth and development. In Current Topics in Plant Physiology Series, Vol.4.( Leonard, R.T. and Hepler, P.K eds.), pp. 26-35. ASPP, Rockville, M.D.
[7] Rengel, Z. 1992. The role of calcium in salt toxicity. Plant Cell Environ. 15: 625-632.
[8] Munns, R. 1993. Physiological processes limiting plant growth in saline soils: Some dogmas and hypothesis. Plant Cell Environment., 16: 15-24
[9] Neumann, P.M. 1997. Salinity resistance and plant growth revisited. Plant cells and Environ., 20:1193-1198.
[10] Paridaa, A.K. & Dasa, A.B. 2005. Salt tolerance and salinity effects on plants: A Review.Ecotoxic. and Environm., 60(3): 324-349.
[11] El – Saidi, M. T. 1997. Salinity and its effects on growth, yield and some physiological processes of crop plants. In: Strategies for improving salt tolerance in higher plants. (Jaiwal, P.K., Singh, R.P. and Gulati, A., eds.), pp. 111-127. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.
[12] El-Fouly, M.M., Moubarak, Z.M. & Salama, Z.A. 2002. Micronutrient foliar application increase salt tolerance of tomato seedlings. Acta Hort., 573: 467-472.
[13] El-Fouly, M. M., Moustafa, H. A. & Attia, K. A. 2006. Chemical composition of soyabeans from plants treated with growth retardants. Pest Sci., 1(5):189-190.
[14] Islam, A., Sayeed, A., Absar, N., Ibrahim, M., Mondal, H. & Alam, S. 2003. Effect of NPK fertilizers and cowdung in combination with foliar spray of chemicals on growth and quality of jute plant. Jour. Biol. Sci., 3(11):1016-1025.
[15] Ahmad, R. & Jabeen, R. 2005. Foliar spray of mineral elements antagonistic to sodium- A Technique to induce salt tolerance in plant growing under saline conditions. Pak. Jour. Bot., 37(4): 913-920.
[16] Jabeen, R & Ahmad, R. 2009. Alleviation of the adverse effects of salt stress by foliar application of sodium antagonistic essential minerals of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L). Pak J Bot 41: 2199–2208.
[17] Diego, A.M., Marta, R.G., Carlos, A.M. & Macro, A.O. 2004. The effects of salt stress on growth, nitrate reduction and proline and glycinebetaine accumulation in Prosopis alba. Brazi. Jour. Plant Physiol., 16(1):39-46.
[18] Srivastava, H.S. 1990.Regulation of nitrate reductase activity in higher plants.Phytochemistry, 19:725-733.
[19] Lea, P.J. 1997.Primary nitrogen metabolism. In: Plant Biochemistry.(DAY, P.M. and Harborn, J.B eds.), p. 273-313. Academic Press, New York.
[20] Chaves, MM, Flexas J, & Pinheiro C. 2009. Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell. Ann Bot 103: 551–560.
[21] Dubey, R.S. 1997. Photosynthesis in plants under stressful conditions. In: Handbook of photosynthesis. (Ed.): M. Pessarakli. New York: Marcel Dekker, p. 859-875.
[22] M. Jamil, S. Rehman, E.S. Rha. 2007a.Salinity effect on plant growth, ps11 photochemistry and chlorophyll content in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) and cabbage (Brassica oleracea capitata L.)Pak. J. Bot., 39 (3) (2007), pp. 753–760.
[23] Bayuelo-Jimenez, J. S., Jasso-Plata, N., & Ochoa, I. 2012. Growth and Physiological responses of Phaseolus species to salinity stress. International Journal of Agronomy.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/527673.
[24] Cramer, G.R. & Novak, R.S. 1992. Supplemental manganese improves the relative growth, net assimilation and photosynthetic rates of salt-stressed barley. Physiol. Plant., 84: 600-605.
[25] Marschner, H. 1995.Mineral nutrition of higher plants.pp.229-299. Academic press, San Diego Abou El-Nour, E.A.A. 2002. Can Supplemented Potassium Foliar Feeding Reduce the Recommended Soil Potassium? Pak. Jour. Biol. Sci., 5(3): 259-262.
[26] Lidon, F.C. & Teixeira, M.G. 2000. Rice tolerance to excess Mn: Implications in the chloroplast lamellae and synthesis of a novel Mn protein. Plant Physiol. and Biochem., 38(12):969-978(10).
[27] Tector, A.B., 1991. Determination of Kjeldhal nitrogen content with Kjeltec autosystems I, II, III and IV. Tector application note AN 30/81, Hoganas, Sweden.
[28] Yashoda, S., D.A Forno, J. H. Cock & K.A. Gomez 1976. Laboratory Manual of physiological studies of Rice IRRI, Los Banos, Philippines.
[29] Kannan S. 2010. Foliar fertilization for sustainable crop production. Sustainable Agriculture Reviews 4: 371- 402
[30] King, B. J., Siddiqui, M.Y. and Glass, A.D.M. 1992. Studies of the uptake of nitrate in barely. V. Estimation of root cytoplasmic nitrate concentration using reductase activity implications for nitrate influx. Plant Physiol., 99: 1582-1589.
[31] Krogmann, D. W. and Jagendorf, A.T. 1958.A Spectrophotometric assay of the Hill Reaction with ferricyanide. Plant Physiol., 32: 373-374.
[32] SPSS. 2005. SPSS: SPSS 11.0 for Windows 98. Chicago: SPSS, Inc.
[33] Duncun, D.B. 1955. Multiple ranges and multiple F-tests. Biometrics. 11: 1-42.
[34] Cazetta, J.S. & Villela, L.C.V. 2004. Nitrate reductase activity in leaves and stems of tanner grass (Brachiaria radicansNapper). Scient. Agrico., 61(6):652-658.
[35] Guleryuz, G. & Arsalan, H. 1999. Nitrate Reductase Activity in Verbascum L.(Scrophulariaceae) Species from the Eastern Mediterranean in Dependence on Altitude. Turk. Jour. Bot., 23:89-96.
[36] Abd El-Samad, H.M., El-Komy, H.M., Shaddad, M.A.K. & Hetta, A.M. 2005.Effect of molybdenum on nitrogenase and nitrate reductase activities of wheat inoculated with Azosporillium brasilense grown under drought stress. Jour. Appl. Plant Physiol., 31(1-2):43-54.
[37] Roberts, N.J. & Menary, R.C. 1994.Effect of nitrogen on growth, flower yield, oil composition, and yield in [Boroniamegastigma (L.)Nees. Jour. Plant Nutri., 17(12) p. 2035-2052.
[38] Barthes, L., Deleens, E., Bousser, A., Hoarau, J. & Jean-Louis Prioul. 1996. Xylem exudation is related to nitrate assimilation pathway in detopped maize seedlings: use of nitrate reductase and glutamine synthetase inhibitors as tools. Jour. Exp. Bot., 47(297) pp. 485-495.
[39] Kawachi, T., Sueyoshi, K., Nakajima, A., Yamagata, H., Sugimoto, T. & Oji, Y. 2002.Expression of asparagine synthetase in rice (Oryza sativa) roots in response to nitrogen. Physiol. Plantrum., 114(1):41-46.
[40] Dordas C., Slavko, P., Brown, P.H., Connell, J.H., Nyomora, A.M. S., Hening, H. and Stangoulis, J. 2001. Foliar boron application improves flower fertility and fruit set of olive. Hort.Sci., 36(4):639-644.
[41] Hasegawa, P.M., R.A. Bressan, J.K. Zhu and H.J. Bohnert. 2000. Plant cellular and molecular responses to high salinity. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol., 51: 463-499.
[42] Munns, R. 2002. Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant, Cell and Environ, 25: 239-250.
[43] Ashraf, M. &M. Shahbaz. 2003. Assessment of genotypic variation in sal t tolerance of early CIMMYT hexaploid wheat germplasm using photosynthetic capacity and water relations as selection criteria. Photosynthetica, 41: 273-280.
[44] Ashraf, M. 2004. Some important physiological selection criteria for salt tolerance in plants. Flora, 199(5): 361-376.
[45] Jabeen, N & Ahmad, R. 2011. Effect of foliar-applied boron and manganese on growth and biochemical activities in Sunflower under saline conditions. Pak. J. Bot., 43(2): 1271-1282, 2011.
[46] Lidon, F.C. & M.G. Teixeira. 2000. Rice tolerance to excess Mn: Implications in the chloroplast lamellae and synthesis of a novel Mn protein. Pant. Physiol. and Biochem, 38(12): 969-978(10).
[47] Krogmann, D. W. & Jagendorf, A.T. 1958.A Spectrophotometric assay of the Hill Reaction with ferricyanide. Plant Physiol., 32: 373-374.
[48] Kenneth, E. F. 1970. Some factors affecting the Hill activity in Cotton Chloroplasts1. Plant Physio, 45:465-469.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Rizwana Jabeen, Rafiq Ahmad. (2015). Some Growth Promoting Essential Mineral Elements Alleviates The Salinity Effect on Nitrate Reductase and Hill Reaction Activities in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) cv. “CIM 496”. Journal of Plant Sciences, 3(2), 54-58. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20150302.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Rizwana Jabeen; Rafiq Ahmad. Some Growth Promoting Essential Mineral Elements Alleviates The Salinity Effect on Nitrate Reductase and Hill Reaction Activities in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) cv. “CIM 496”. J. Plant Sci. 2015, 3(2), 54-58. doi: 10.11648/j.jps.20150302.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Rizwana Jabeen, Rafiq Ahmad. Some Growth Promoting Essential Mineral Elements Alleviates The Salinity Effect on Nitrate Reductase and Hill Reaction Activities in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) cv. “CIM 496”. J Plant Sci. 2015;3(2):54-58. doi: 10.11648/j.jps.20150302.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.jps.20150302.12,
      author = {Rizwana Jabeen and Rafiq Ahmad},
      title = {Some Growth Promoting Essential Mineral Elements Alleviates The Salinity Effect on Nitrate Reductase and Hill Reaction Activities in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) cv. “CIM 496”},
      journal = {Journal of Plant Sciences},
      volume = {3},
      number = {2},
      pages = {54-58},
      doi = {10.11648/j.jps.20150302.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20150302.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jps.20150302.12},
      abstract = {The effect of salinity was observed on the activity of nitrate reductase and hill reaction activity in the leaves of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cv. “CIM 496” grown in large size plastic  pot culture, irrigated with sea salt concentrations of 0.0%(EC iw: 0.6 dS/m), 0.4%(EC iw: 6.2 dS/m) and 0.8%(EC iw: 10.8 dS/m) and subjected to foliar application with non-spray (control), water spray, KNO3 (500 ppm), KCl (500 ppm), Urea(1000 ppm), Fe-EDTA (5ppm), MnCl2 (5ppm) and MoO3 (5ppm) alone and their mixture. Foliar spray of the mixture showed better result as compared to that of above mentioned individual mineral. Conclusion made on the comparative performance of nitrate reductase and hill reaction enzymes under above number of treatments in the leaves of cotton growing under various sea salt concentrations is given below: Nitrate Reductase Activity (NRA): Nonspray< water spray< KCl< Mo< KNO3< Urea< KNO3 + Mo< KNO3 +Fe + Mn + Mo; Hill Reaction Activity (HRA): Nonspray< water spray< KNO3
    											

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Some Growth Promoting Essential Mineral Elements Alleviates The Salinity Effect on Nitrate Reductase and Hill Reaction Activities in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) cv. “CIM 496”
    AU  - Rizwana Jabeen
    AU  - Rafiq Ahmad
    Y1  - 2015/02/25
    PY  - 2015
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20150302.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.jps.20150302.12
    T2  - Journal of Plant Sciences
    JF  - Journal of Plant Sciences
    JO  - Journal of Plant Sciences
    SP  - 54
    EP  - 58
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2331-0731
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20150302.12
    AB  - The effect of salinity was observed on the activity of nitrate reductase and hill reaction activity in the leaves of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cv. “CIM 496” grown in large size plastic  pot culture, irrigated with sea salt concentrations of 0.0%(EC iw: 0.6 dS/m), 0.4%(EC iw: 6.2 dS/m) and 0.8%(EC iw: 10.8 dS/m) and subjected to foliar application with non-spray (control), water spray, KNO3 (500 ppm), KCl (500 ppm), Urea(1000 ppm), Fe-EDTA (5ppm), MnCl2 (5ppm) and MoO3 (5ppm) alone and their mixture. Foliar spray of the mixture showed better result as compared to that of above mentioned individual mineral. Conclusion made on the comparative performance of nitrate reductase and hill reaction enzymes under above number of treatments in the leaves of cotton growing under various sea salt concentrations is given below: Nitrate Reductase Activity (NRA): Nonspray< water spray< KCl< Mo< KNO3< Urea< KNO3 + Mo< KNO3 +Fe + Mn + Mo; Hill Reaction Activity (HRA): Nonspray< water spray< KNO3
    											

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Botany Government College for Women Shahrah-e-Liaquat, Karachi, Pakistan

  • Department of Botany Government College for Women Shahrah-e-Liaquat, Karachi, Pakistan

  • Sections