Father Ianaros, the main character of Nikos Kazantzakis’ Fratricides is leading a two-way battle, a real conflict with himself as well as the struggle between body and soul, torn between fascists and communists. The confusion between red and black, between life and death (bodily and spiritual) and its source that rests in the peace without peace that the priest confronts in his questions is often made. If the war of the soul with the body remains, somehow, always on the same line, the contradiction between yes and no, between Nai and Ohi (Gk.) multiplies (but having in common the priest’s consciousness of Castelos), knowing several directions possibilities: the fellowship either with the red, or the black side; the isolation from the real world; abdicating from the condition of priest as the angel of God on earth. Like Jesus, pushed up and down by the wave of doubt, the father of the village lies at the crossroads between various judgments, set out to find the truth in the wilderness of questions. Much of the agony is his struggling with loneliness, under the monos position before a herd ravaged by civil war. The dilemma is amplified, tripled, and the choice is complicated. Therefore, at Nikos Kazantzakis, the necessarily provided Pascalian condition of man, half zoon, half angel comes to be higher, the demands made on man actually referring only to his angelic, superhuman nature, hardly allowing the pacification.
Published in |
International Journal of Literature and Arts (Volume 2, Issue 6-1)
This article belongs to the Special Issue Discourses of Militarization and Identity: Literature of Conflict |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijla.s.2014020601.15 |
Page(s) | 30-34 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2015. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Conflict, Priest, Pacifism, Self, Actual Patterns
[1] | Mic dicţionar enciclopedic, Bucureşti: Editura Ştiinţifică şi Enciclopedică, 1978, p. 227. |
[2] | David B. Curalnik Webster’s New World Dictionary of the American Language, Second College Edition, New York: Prentice Hall Press, 1986, p. 298. |
[3] | Alexandra Medrea-Danciu, in Preface to Fratricides, Timişoara: Editura de Vest, 1993, p. 10. |
[4] | George Theotokas, Diary Notebooks 1939-1954, Athens: Estia, 1987, pp. 573-574. |
[5] | Umberto Eco, Opera aperta, Milano: Bompiani, 1962, p. 19. |
[6] | Charitini Christodoulou, Dialogic Openness in Nikos Kazantzakis, Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2012, p.12. |
[7] | Dicționarul General al Literaturii Române, vol. A-B, Bucureşti: Editura Univers Enciclopedic, 2004, p.328. |
[8] | Nikos Kazantzakis. Fratricides, Timişoara: Editura de Vest, 1993, p.60. |
APA Style
Amalia-Florentina Drăgulănescu. (2015). States of Conflict and the Idea of Pacifism in the Novel Fratricides. International Journal of Literature and Arts, 2(6-1), 30-34. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.s.2014020601.15
ACS Style
Amalia-Florentina Drăgulănescu. States of Conflict and the Idea of Pacifism in the Novel Fratricides. Int. J. Lit. Arts 2015, 2(6-1), 30-34. doi: 10.11648/j.ijla.s.2014020601.15
AMA Style
Amalia-Florentina Drăgulănescu. States of Conflict and the Idea of Pacifism in the Novel Fratricides. Int J Lit Arts. 2015;2(6-1):30-34. doi: 10.11648/j.ijla.s.2014020601.15
@article{10.11648/j.ijla.s.2014020601.15, author = {Amalia-Florentina Drăgulănescu}, title = {States of Conflict and the Idea of Pacifism in the Novel Fratricides}, journal = {International Journal of Literature and Arts}, volume = {2}, number = {6-1}, pages = {30-34}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijla.s.2014020601.15}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.s.2014020601.15}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijla.s.2014020601.15}, abstract = {Father Ianaros, the main character of Nikos Kazantzakis’ Fratricides is leading a two-way battle, a real conflict with himself as well as the struggle between body and soul, torn between fascists and communists. The confusion between red and black, between life and death (bodily and spiritual) and its source that rests in the peace without peace that the priest confronts in his questions is often made. If the war of the soul with the body remains, somehow, always on the same line, the contradiction between yes and no, between Nai and Ohi (Gk.) multiplies (but having in common the priest’s consciousness of Castelos), knowing several directions possibilities: the fellowship either with the red, or the black side; the isolation from the real world; abdicating from the condition of priest as the angel of God on earth. Like Jesus, pushed up and down by the wave of doubt, the father of the village lies at the crossroads between various judgments, set out to find the truth in the wilderness of questions. Much of the agony is his struggling with loneliness, under the monos position before a herd ravaged by civil war. The dilemma is amplified, tripled, and the choice is complicated. Therefore, at Nikos Kazantzakis, the necessarily provided Pascalian condition of man, half zoon, half angel comes to be higher, the demands made on man actually referring only to his angelic, superhuman nature, hardly allowing the pacification.}, year = {2015} }
TY - JOUR T1 - States of Conflict and the Idea of Pacifism in the Novel Fratricides AU - Amalia-Florentina Drăgulănescu Y1 - 2015/01/14 PY - 2015 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.s.2014020601.15 DO - 10.11648/j.ijla.s.2014020601.15 T2 - International Journal of Literature and Arts JF - International Journal of Literature and Arts JO - International Journal of Literature and Arts SP - 30 EP - 34 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2331-057X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.s.2014020601.15 AB - Father Ianaros, the main character of Nikos Kazantzakis’ Fratricides is leading a two-way battle, a real conflict with himself as well as the struggle between body and soul, torn between fascists and communists. The confusion between red and black, between life and death (bodily and spiritual) and its source that rests in the peace without peace that the priest confronts in his questions is often made. If the war of the soul with the body remains, somehow, always on the same line, the contradiction between yes and no, between Nai and Ohi (Gk.) multiplies (but having in common the priest’s consciousness of Castelos), knowing several directions possibilities: the fellowship either with the red, or the black side; the isolation from the real world; abdicating from the condition of priest as the angel of God on earth. Like Jesus, pushed up and down by the wave of doubt, the father of the village lies at the crossroads between various judgments, set out to find the truth in the wilderness of questions. Much of the agony is his struggling with loneliness, under the monos position before a herd ravaged by civil war. The dilemma is amplified, tripled, and the choice is complicated. Therefore, at Nikos Kazantzakis, the necessarily provided Pascalian condition of man, half zoon, half angel comes to be higher, the demands made on man actually referring only to his angelic, superhuman nature, hardly allowing the pacification. VL - 2 IS - 6-1 ER -