This study has been conducted to assess the present scenario of spraying insecticides/fungicides during the whole cultivation period of mango in Shibgonj upazilla of Chapainawabgonj district. A total number of 250 mango growers were randomly selected and interviewed by structured questionnaires from December, 2014 to June, 2015. The data were collected with respect to their educational level, cultivating land, times and types of insecticides/fungicides spray, and farmer’s consciousness about the excessive use of insecticides/fungicides. Out of the 250 mango growers, 184 were illiterate which accounts almost 74% followed by under HSC, 51 (20%) and higher educated, 15 (6%). Around 1-3 acre of land was used by 145 (58%) mango growers for cultivation followed by 3-7 acre by 85 (34%) and more than 7 acres by 20 (8%). Eight insecticides and seven fungicides under different trade names were most commonly sprayed at 2, 3, 4, and even more than 7 times in the stage of mango flowering, green mango, and finally, in mature stages. Most importantly, 151 (60%) growers do not have any, while 99 (40%) have very little knowledge about the negative effects of using excessive amounts of insecticides/fungicides. The mango growers are randomly using same pesticides under different brand name. Additionally, they frequently use fungicides instead of insecticides that cause no death of mango pest. As a result, they could not protect early dropping of mangoes. Furthermore, 103 (41%) and 147 (59%) growers have little and no knowledge regarding the side effects of spraying of formalin and calcium carbide that are used for preservation and early ripening of mango, respectively. Therefore, necessary actions should be taken immediately keeping in mind not only to reduce the early fall out of mangoes but also to produce safe mangoes for consumption.
Published in | Science Journal of Public Health (Volume 4, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.sjph.20160401.13 |
Page(s) | 20-25 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2016. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Mango Cultivation, Mango Growers, Insecticides and Fungicides
[1] | Takele H. Review of mango value chain in Ethiopia, Journal of biology, agriculture and health care, 2014, vol. 4, pp. 230-239. |
[2] | Alexander DMcE. The mango in Australia, Common-wealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Australia. 1989, pp. 1-28. |
[3] | FAO. Production Yearbook. Statistical series No. 142. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy. 2009, pp. 163. |
[4] | Kobra K, Hossain MA, Talukder MAH, Bhuyan MAJ. Performance of twelve mango cultivars growing in different agro-ecological zones of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Agriculture Research. Vol. 37, No. 4, 2012, pp. 691-710. |
[5] | UN FAOSTAT. Statistics from: Food and Agricultural Organization of United Nations: Economic and Social Development: The Statistical Division. UN Food and Agriculture Organization Corporate Statistical Database, 2011. |
[6] | BBS. Statistical Yearbook of Bangladesh 2012 (32 edition, August, 2013). Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, Statistics and Informations Division, Ministry of Planning, Government of Peoples Republic of Bangladesh. 2013, pp. 146-149. |
[7] | District Statistics 2011. Chapai Nawabganj, Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS), Statistics and Information Division (SID), Ministry of Planning, Government of The People’s Republic of Bangladesh, 2013 |
[8] | Alam SN. Insect pest management for quality horticultural crop production in Bangladesh. HORTEX NEWSLETTER, 2011, Vol. 11, No. 2. |
[9] | Dessalegna Y, Assefab H, Dersoc T, Tefera M, Mango Production Knowledge and Technological Gaps of Smallholder Farmers in Amhara Region, Ethiopia. American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences, 2014, vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 28-39. |
[10] | Sanborn M, Kerr KJ, Sanin LH, Cole DC, Bassil KL, Vakil C. Non-cancer health effects of pesticides: systematic review and implications for family doctors. Can Fam Physician, 2007, vol. 53, No. 10, pp. 1712–20. |
[11] | Jurewicz J, Hanke W. Prenatal and childhood exposure to pesticides and neurobehavioral development: review of epidemiological studies. Int J Occup Med Environ Health, 2008, vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 121–32. |
APA Style
Asad Ud-Daula, Salim Raza, Golam Mukit, Soumen Das, A. T. M. Mijanur Rahman, et al. (2016). Present Scenario of Insecticides and Fungicides Use in Largest Mango Cultivation Area in Bangladesh. Science Journal of Public Health, 4(1), 20-25. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjph.20160401.13
ACS Style
Asad Ud-Daula; Salim Raza; Golam Mukit; Soumen Das; A. T. M. Mijanur Rahman, et al. Present Scenario of Insecticides and Fungicides Use in Largest Mango Cultivation Area in Bangladesh. Sci. J. Public Health 2016, 4(1), 20-25. doi: 10.11648/j.sjph.20160401.13
AMA Style
Asad Ud-Daula, Salim Raza, Golam Mukit, Soumen Das, A. T. M. Mijanur Rahman, et al. Present Scenario of Insecticides and Fungicides Use in Largest Mango Cultivation Area in Bangladesh. Sci J Public Health. 2016;4(1):20-25. doi: 10.11648/j.sjph.20160401.13
@article{10.11648/j.sjph.20160401.13, author = {Asad Ud-Daula and Salim Raza and Golam Mukit and Soumen Das and A. T. M. Mijanur Rahman and Abul Kashem Tang}, title = {Present Scenario of Insecticides and Fungicides Use in Largest Mango Cultivation Area in Bangladesh}, journal = {Science Journal of Public Health}, volume = {4}, number = {1}, pages = {20-25}, doi = {10.11648/j.sjph.20160401.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjph.20160401.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sjph.20160401.13}, abstract = {This study has been conducted to assess the present scenario of spraying insecticides/fungicides during the whole cultivation period of mango in Shibgonj upazilla of Chapainawabgonj district. A total number of 250 mango growers were randomly selected and interviewed by structured questionnaires from December, 2014 to June, 2015. The data were collected with respect to their educational level, cultivating land, times and types of insecticides/fungicides spray, and farmer’s consciousness about the excessive use of insecticides/fungicides. Out of the 250 mango growers, 184 were illiterate which accounts almost 74% followed by under HSC, 51 (20%) and higher educated, 15 (6%). Around 1-3 acre of land was used by 145 (58%) mango growers for cultivation followed by 3-7 acre by 85 (34%) and more than 7 acres by 20 (8%). Eight insecticides and seven fungicides under different trade names were most commonly sprayed at 2, 3, 4, and even more than 7 times in the stage of mango flowering, green mango, and finally, in mature stages. Most importantly, 151 (60%) growers do not have any, while 99 (40%) have very little knowledge about the negative effects of using excessive amounts of insecticides/fungicides. The mango growers are randomly using same pesticides under different brand name. Additionally, they frequently use fungicides instead of insecticides that cause no death of mango pest. As a result, they could not protect early dropping of mangoes. Furthermore, 103 (41%) and 147 (59%) growers have little and no knowledge regarding the side effects of spraying of formalin and calcium carbide that are used for preservation and early ripening of mango, respectively. Therefore, necessary actions should be taken immediately keeping in mind not only to reduce the early fall out of mangoes but also to produce safe mangoes for consumption.}, year = {2016} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Present Scenario of Insecticides and Fungicides Use in Largest Mango Cultivation Area in Bangladesh AU - Asad Ud-Daula AU - Salim Raza AU - Golam Mukit AU - Soumen Das AU - A. T. M. Mijanur Rahman AU - Abul Kashem Tang Y1 - 2016/01/27 PY - 2016 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjph.20160401.13 DO - 10.11648/j.sjph.20160401.13 T2 - Science Journal of Public Health JF - Science Journal of Public Health JO - Science Journal of Public Health SP - 20 EP - 25 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-7950 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjph.20160401.13 AB - This study has been conducted to assess the present scenario of spraying insecticides/fungicides during the whole cultivation period of mango in Shibgonj upazilla of Chapainawabgonj district. A total number of 250 mango growers were randomly selected and interviewed by structured questionnaires from December, 2014 to June, 2015. The data were collected with respect to their educational level, cultivating land, times and types of insecticides/fungicides spray, and farmer’s consciousness about the excessive use of insecticides/fungicides. Out of the 250 mango growers, 184 were illiterate which accounts almost 74% followed by under HSC, 51 (20%) and higher educated, 15 (6%). Around 1-3 acre of land was used by 145 (58%) mango growers for cultivation followed by 3-7 acre by 85 (34%) and more than 7 acres by 20 (8%). Eight insecticides and seven fungicides under different trade names were most commonly sprayed at 2, 3, 4, and even more than 7 times in the stage of mango flowering, green mango, and finally, in mature stages. Most importantly, 151 (60%) growers do not have any, while 99 (40%) have very little knowledge about the negative effects of using excessive amounts of insecticides/fungicides. The mango growers are randomly using same pesticides under different brand name. Additionally, they frequently use fungicides instead of insecticides that cause no death of mango pest. As a result, they could not protect early dropping of mangoes. Furthermore, 103 (41%) and 147 (59%) growers have little and no knowledge regarding the side effects of spraying of formalin and calcium carbide that are used for preservation and early ripening of mango, respectively. Therefore, necessary actions should be taken immediately keeping in mind not only to reduce the early fall out of mangoes but also to produce safe mangoes for consumption. VL - 4 IS - 1 ER -