Utilization of nature tourism in Bunaken National Park (BNP) with some uniqueness in it and has lasted a long time tend to uncontrolled activities because there are provisions of nature tourism use regulationsthat have not been fully implemented. This study aims to evaluate the implementation of nature tourism use regulations within development of tourism governance in BNP. Implementation of nature tourism use regulations by analyzing the contents of the text regulations to see the adequacy of the content, the implementation of the regulations by implementing and target groups, and the mechanism of stakeholder relations in the implementation ofregulations. The research conducted at BNP from July to October 2014. The data was collected through observation, interviews, and literature studies. Data and information were then analyzed using content analysis and qualitative descriptive analysis. The results adequacy of the contents and functions, nature tourism use regulations namely nature tourismconsession and the type and rates of non-tax revenues (use of environmental services nature tourism) met the requirements for regulating and controlling the behavior of stakeholders. But the implementation is not received a positive response from the implementing rules and target group. Mechanism of stakeholder relations in the implementation of nature tourismuse regulations needs to be managed so that it does not lead to a sharper conflict but can create complementary and cooperative relations.
Published in | Social Sciences (Volume 4, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ss.20150403.13 |
Page(s) | 42-52 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2015. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Implementation, Regulation, Tourism Governance, Bunaken National Park
[1] | Direktorat Pemanfaatan Jasa lingkungan Kawasan Konservasi dan Hutan Lindung.Peraturan Pemerintah terkait Pemanfaatan Wisata Alam dengan Pengusahaan Pariwisata Alam. Direktorat Jenderal PHKA, Kementerian Kehutanan, 2013. |
[2] | Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 12 Tahun 2014 tentang Jenis dan Tarif Atas Jenis Penerimaan Negara Bukan Pajak yang Berlaku pada Kementerian Kehutanan. Diunduh pada tanggal 18 April 2014 dari http://www.dephut.go.id/uploads/files/7423383b3e998410e068625269418936.PDF. |
[3] | Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 18 Tahun 1994 tentang Pengusahaan Pariwisata Alam di Zona Pemanfaatan Taman Nasional, Taman Hutan Raya dan Taman Wisata Alam. Diunduh pada tanggal 10 Mei 2010 dari http://bksdadiy.dephut.go.id/images/data/PP_18_1994.pdf. |
[4] | Direktorat Pemanfaatan Jasa lingkungan Kawasan Konservasi dan Hutan Lindung.Peraturan Pemerintah terkait Pemanfaatan Wisata Alam dengan Penerimaan Negara Bukan Pajak. Direktorat Jenderal PHKA, Kementerian Kehutanan, 2013. |
[5] | Direktorat Pemanfaatan Jasa lingkungan Kawasan Konservasi dan Hutan Lindung.Undang-Undang Bidang Kehutananterkait Pemanfaatan Wisata Alam. Direktorat Jenderal PHKA, Kementerian Kehutanan, 2013. |
[6] | C.M. Hall.A Typology of governance and its implications for tourism policy analysis. Tourism governance, critical perspectives on governance and sustanaibility, edited by Bill Bramwel and Bernard Lane. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. Vol. 19, Nos. 4–5, May–June 2011, 437–457. Routledge, Taylor & Francie Group. London and Newyork, 2011. |
[7] | J. Kooiman. Governing as governance. Los Angeles, CA: Sage. 2003. |
[8] | J. Saunders dan R. Reeve. Monitoring Governance for Implementation of REDD+.London: Chatham House.2010. |
[9] | E.K.S.H. Muntasib. Tata Kelola Pariwisata Alam di Indonesia. Dalam Seminar Kebijakan, Tantangan dan Peluang Pariwisata Alam di Indonesia. Asosiasi Pariwisata Alam Indonesia (APAI). Gedung Manggala Wanabakti. Jakarta, 2009. |
[10] | T.R.Dye. Undestanding public policy. New Jersey: Prentice Hail,1995. |
[11] | M. Howlett& M. Ramesh.Studying public policy: Policy cycles and policy subsystems. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. |
[12] | D.A. Mazmanian, P.A. Sabatier, P.A.Implementation and Public Policy. Polo Alto: Scott, Foresman Company, 1983. |
[13] | H. Kartodihardjo. Kepemerintahan dan Kebijakan Kehutanan: Soal Diskursus dan Reduksi Ilmu Pengetahuan. Di dalam: Kartodihardjo H (Ed), Kembali ke Jalan Lurus, Kritik Penggunaan Ilmu dan Praktek Kehutanan Indonesia. Bogor: Forci Development. 2012. |
[14] | E. Roslinda, D. Darusman, D. Suharjito, D.R. Nurohmat. Stakeholders Analysis on the Management of Danau.Sentarum National Park Kapuas Halu Regency, West Kalimantan. Jurnal Managemen Hutan Tropis, Vol. XVIII, (2): 78-85, Agustus 2012 EISSN: 2089-2063 DOI: 10.7226/jtfm. 1 8.2.78. 2012. |
[15] | M.S. Reed, A. Graves, N. Dandy, H. Posthumus, K.Hubacek, J. Morris, C. Prell, C.H. Quinn, L.C. Stringer.. Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management XXX (2009) 1–17.Elsevier Ltd, 2009. |
[16] | P. Irawan. Penelitian Kulitatif & Kuantitatif Untuk Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial. Jakarta: Departemen Ilmu Administrasi Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Indonesia, 2006. |
[17] | B. Bungin.Penelitian Kualitatif: Komunikasi, Ekonomi, Kebijakan Publik, dan Ilmu Sosial Lainnya. Jakarta: Kencana, 2010. |
[18] | I.N. Dewi, R.H.B. Achmad , P. Kusumedi.Studi of the Implementation of Protection Forest Management Rules : Case Study in Pangkep and maros Regencies, South Sulawesi Province). Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan, 7(3), 195−209. 2010. |
[19] | Sugiyono. Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2010. |
[20] | Direktorat Pemanfaatan Jasa lingkungan dan Hutan Lindung. 2015.Prosedur pemberian IUPJWA dan proses IUPSWA Direktorat Jenderal PHKA, Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan.Diunduh pada tanggal 26 Maret 2015 dari http://ekowisata.org/perijinan/ippa/.. |
[21] | S. Ekawati.Evaluation of the Implementation of Decentralization Policy on Production Forest management. Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan, 10(3), 187−202. 2013. |
[22] | Balai TN Bunaken.Rencana Teknis Pengembangan Ekowisata Taman Nasional Bunaken. Sulawesi Utara, 2008. |
[23] | H. Kartodihardjo..Kebijakan pengelolaan Hutan: Perumusan Kebijakan dan Implementasinya. Bahan Pelatihan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup Daerah. Topik: Desentralisasi Sumberdaya Hutan. KLH: Juli 2006. |
[24] | Dominggus, R. Merril, I. Arsyad.Dewan Pengelolaan Taman Nasional Bunaken.Sebuah Proses Membangun dan Memperkuat Pemangku Kepentingan terhadap Pelestarian Taman Nasional Bunaken. NRM EPIQ Program’s Protected Area & Forest Management Team. Jakarta, 2001. |
[25] | N. Kosmaryandi, S. Basuni, L.B. Prasetyo, S. Adiwibowo. New Idea for national Park Zoning System :a Synthesis between Biodiversity Conservation and Customary Community’s Tradition. Jurnal Managemen Hutan Tropis, Vol. XVIII, (2): 78-85, Agustus 2012 EISSN: 2089-2063 DOI: 10.7226/jtfm. 1 8.2.78. 2012. |
[26] | Li TM.Masyarakat adat, difference and the limits of recognition. Indonesia’s forest zone. Modern Asian Studies 35 (3):645-676. DOI : 10.1017/S0026749X01003067. 2001. |
[27] | Balai TN Bunaken. Laporan Inventarisasi Kepemilikan Lahan di Pulau Bunaken. Manado, 2012. |
[28] | Balai TN Bunaken. Laporan Inventarisasi Kegiatan Pengusahaan Pariwisata Alam. Manado, 2010. |
[29] | Balai TN Bunaken. Rencana Pengelolaan Taman Nasional Bunaken, Buku 1. Sub Balai Konservasi Sumberdaya Alam Sulawesi Utara, 1997. |
[30] | M.A. Muhamadiyah. Study of the Implementation of Wildlife Utilization Rules in Maros Regency, South Sulawesi. Disertation IPB. Bogor, 2014. |
[31] | NSWA. North Sulawesi Watersport Association. Diunduh pada 14 September 2014 dari http://www.divenorthsulawesi.com/nswa.html. |
[32] | Himpunan Pengelola Wisata Lokal Bunaken. Keputusan rapat musyawarah pelaku usaha pariwisata lokal dan pribumi Kelurahan Bunaken tentang perumusan anggaran dasar dan anggaran rumah tangga himpunan pengelola wisata lokal Bunaken. Bunaken, 2001. |
[33] | Forum Masyarakat Peduli Taman Nasional Bunaken. Peraturan Dasar Forum Masyarakat Peduli Taman Nasional Bunaken. Tiwoho-Wori, 2011. |
[34] | Bunaken Destination Management Organization. Desain Strategi dan Rencana Aksi. Manado, 2013. |
APA Style
Heri Santoso, Endang Koestati Sri Harini Muntasib, Hariadi Kartodihardjo, Rinekso Soekmadi. (2015). Implementation of Nature Tourism Use Regulations in Order to Development of Tourism Governance in Bunaken National Park. Social Sciences, 4(3), 42-52. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20150403.13
ACS Style
Heri Santoso; Endang Koestati Sri Harini Muntasib; Hariadi Kartodihardjo; Rinekso Soekmadi. Implementation of Nature Tourism Use Regulations in Order to Development of Tourism Governance in Bunaken National Park. Soc. Sci. 2015, 4(3), 42-52. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20150403.13
AMA Style
Heri Santoso, Endang Koestati Sri Harini Muntasib, Hariadi Kartodihardjo, Rinekso Soekmadi. Implementation of Nature Tourism Use Regulations in Order to Development of Tourism Governance in Bunaken National Park. Soc Sci. 2015;4(3):42-52. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20150403.13
@article{10.11648/j.ss.20150403.13, author = {Heri Santoso and Endang Koestati Sri Harini Muntasib and Hariadi Kartodihardjo and Rinekso Soekmadi}, title = {Implementation of Nature Tourism Use Regulations in Order to Development of Tourism Governance in Bunaken National Park}, journal = {Social Sciences}, volume = {4}, number = {3}, pages = {42-52}, doi = {10.11648/j.ss.20150403.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20150403.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ss.20150403.13}, abstract = {Utilization of nature tourism in Bunaken National Park (BNP) with some uniqueness in it and has lasted a long time tend to uncontrolled activities because there are provisions of nature tourism use regulationsthat have not been fully implemented. This study aims to evaluate the implementation of nature tourism use regulations within development of tourism governance in BNP. Implementation of nature tourism use regulations by analyzing the contents of the text regulations to see the adequacy of the content, the implementation of the regulations by implementing and target groups, and the mechanism of stakeholder relations in the implementation ofregulations. The research conducted at BNP from July to October 2014. The data was collected through observation, interviews, and literature studies. Data and information were then analyzed using content analysis and qualitative descriptive analysis. The results adequacy of the contents and functions, nature tourism use regulations namely nature tourismconsession and the type and rates of non-tax revenues (use of environmental services nature tourism) met the requirements for regulating and controlling the behavior of stakeholders. But the implementation is not received a positive response from the implementing rules and target group. Mechanism of stakeholder relations in the implementation of nature tourismuse regulations needs to be managed so that it does not lead to a sharper conflict but can create complementary and cooperative relations.}, year = {2015} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Implementation of Nature Tourism Use Regulations in Order to Development of Tourism Governance in Bunaken National Park AU - Heri Santoso AU - Endang Koestati Sri Harini Muntasib AU - Hariadi Kartodihardjo AU - Rinekso Soekmadi Y1 - 2015/05/13 PY - 2015 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20150403.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ss.20150403.13 T2 - Social Sciences JF - Social Sciences JO - Social Sciences SP - 42 EP - 52 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2326-988X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20150403.13 AB - Utilization of nature tourism in Bunaken National Park (BNP) with some uniqueness in it and has lasted a long time tend to uncontrolled activities because there are provisions of nature tourism use regulationsthat have not been fully implemented. This study aims to evaluate the implementation of nature tourism use regulations within development of tourism governance in BNP. Implementation of nature tourism use regulations by analyzing the contents of the text regulations to see the adequacy of the content, the implementation of the regulations by implementing and target groups, and the mechanism of stakeholder relations in the implementation ofregulations. The research conducted at BNP from July to October 2014. The data was collected through observation, interviews, and literature studies. Data and information were then analyzed using content analysis and qualitative descriptive analysis. The results adequacy of the contents and functions, nature tourism use regulations namely nature tourismconsession and the type and rates of non-tax revenues (use of environmental services nature tourism) met the requirements for regulating and controlling the behavior of stakeholders. But the implementation is not received a positive response from the implementing rules and target group. Mechanism of stakeholder relations in the implementation of nature tourismuse regulations needs to be managed so that it does not lead to a sharper conflict but can create complementary and cooperative relations. VL - 4 IS - 3 ER -